APA MGT 300 4 page essay

STUCK with your assignment? When is it due? Hire our professional essay experts who are available online 24/7 for an essay paper written to a high standard at a reasonable price.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Option #3: Leadership and Teams – Conformity

As a manager of a team attempting to improve your skills, submit your response to the following statements:

  1. Determine if the desire to be accepted as a member of a group leaves an employee susceptible to conforming to the group’s norms.
  2. Decide if a group can exert pressure that’s strong enough to change a member’s attitudes and behavior.
  3. Examine a leadership model (a valid one, by today’s research
    standards, as discussed in this module’s materials) that would have the
    most impact on your team performance.
  4. Explain how you can use this analysis to help you be a better manager.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Write clearly and logically, as you will be graded on content,
analysis, and your adherence to the tenets of good academic writing,
which should be succinct where possible while also exploring the topics
appropriately. Although three outside scholarly sources are required for
this paper, remember that you can always improve your work by providing
support from additional outside scholarly sources, which helps both to
bolster your own assertions and supplement your ideas.

Business Management and Administration Library Guide
A Library Guide is available via the following link to serve as a great resource in this course for you. The
Library Guide provides a variety of pre-selected databases within the
library that are designed to support this specific course.
Be sure to use this link throughout the course to support your assignment and discussion board research efforts: Management Library Guide (Links to an external site.).

Recommended

Rubric

MGT300 Mod 3 CT

MGT300 Mod 3 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Requirements

15.0
to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation

The
paper demonstrates an understanding of theoretical leadership models or
the paper demonstrates an understanding of ethical issues in leadership
and teams. The paper includes all of the required components as
specified in the assignment, 3-4 pages in length, APA formatting, and
scholarly sources.

12.0
to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

The paper includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

9.0
to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation

The paper includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

The paper includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates
strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents
knowledge from the readings and sources, and references key concepts
with in-text citations to support answers.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Critical Thinking

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Provides
strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis on the application of
theoretical leadership models in leadership and teams or an analysis of
ethical issues in leadership and teams.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight, and analysis.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight, and analysis.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Sources / Examples

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Sources
or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen
to provide substance and perspectives on the perspectives on the
assignment.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the assignment.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as
outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few
errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Project
is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as
outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph
structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Project
is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent
to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in
grammar and spelling.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Project
is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format.
Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Few
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

Significant
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points:
75.0

Writerbay.net

Everyone needs a little help with academic work from time to time. Hire the best essay writing professionals working for us today!

Get a 15% discount for your first order


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper