I need a paper that reference my Milestone 1.

I need a paper that reference my Milestone 1.
OL 620 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric For t he fina l project, you will ana lyze Emerging Pharmaceuticals in order to evaluate and revise the com pany’s c urrent total rewards system . You will ut ilize information presented in t he case study to com par e and contrast the organization’s total rew ard syste m with external benc hmarking data. You will also ana lyze the d ata for gaps and make revisions to the existing compens ation and ben efits pa ckage. Th e information you are provided with will be based on a specif ic asp ect of a ben efits and compens ation package (retirement ben efits, m edical ben efits, and so on). You must also create a presentation to stakeholders that exp lains the proposed changes, your rationale beh ind the ch an ges, and the implications of the changes for the organization. For Mileston e Two, you will p repare a d raft of Parts D–F of your total rewards ana lysis ( Sec tion I of the final project). T he submission will h ave the major h eading “Total Rewards Analysis: Parts D–F.” Your instruc tor will g rade your su bmiss ion u sing the rub ric be low and will p rov ide fee dback you can apply to your final project. Beg in by ana lyz ing qualitative and quantitative data for the cu rrent system (as iden tifi ed in the case study and the provided su pp lements) that will i nform your future recom men dations and revisions. Once your a nalysis h as b een completed, com pare and contrast the provided quantitative data regarding the cu rrent ben efits and compens ation syste m with extern al ben chmarki ng data from Medtronic, an organization within the same industry. Then draft Parts D–F of your ana lysis. Tho rough ly cov er each of the criti cal e lements, and inc lude your an swers to the gu iding questions. Specifi cally, the following critical eleme nts must be ad dressed: I. Total Rewards Ana lysis: For this part of the as sessment, you will analyze g iven asp ects of a total rewards package f rom the prov ided case stud y. You will a nalyze q ualitat ive and quantita tive data reg arding the cu rrent system and determine ga ps in that system that will inform yo ur fut ure recom men dations and revisions. D. Determine areas of misalignme nt, differe nces, an d gap s pres ent in the curre nt benefits and compens ation system, based on the external benc hmarki ng da ta. Wh at are the key areas of the cu rrent s ystem that a re misa lign ed with the competition ? E. Based on the strengths and weaknesses of each plan, d etermine Emerging Pharmaceuticals rewards compon ents that sh ould be increased, reduced, or stay the same, and prov ide your rat ionale. F. Compare q ualitative inpu t data and quantitat ive analysis with the organizati on’s employee demograph ic d ata to de termine the de gree of the existing popu lation that will be affe cted by the pro posed cha ng es. In other words, what is the overall impact of each proposed cha ng e? Rubric Guide lines for Sub mission : This milestone should be 3 to 4 pages in length (in addi tion to a cover page an d references) an d should be sub mitted as a Microsoft Word document with doubl e spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, an d one-inch margin s. Use at least three sources, which should be cited accordin g to APA style. Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (80%) Not Evident (0%) Value Total Rewards Analysis: Misalignment, Differences, and Gaps Determines areas of misalignment, differences, and gaps present in the current benefits and compensation system, based on the external benchmarking data Determines areas of misalignment, differences, and gaps present in the current benefits and compensation system, but determination is cursory or illogical Does not determine areas of misalignment, differences, and gaps present in the current benefits and compensation system 30 Total Rewards Analysis: Increased , Reduced or Stay the Same Determines rewards components that should be increased , reduced or stay the same, providing appropriate rationale Determines rewards components that should be increased , reduced or stay the same, but rationale is cursory, illogical, or there are gaps Does not determine rewards components that should be increased , reduced or stay the same 30 Total Rewards Analysis: Population Affected Compares qualitative input data and quantitative analysis with the organization’s employee demographic data to determine the degree of the existing population that will be affected by the proposed changes Compares qualitative input data and quantitative analysis with the organization’s employee demographic data to determi ne the degree of the existing population that will be affected by the proposed changes, but analysis or is cursory or illogical, or there are gaps in determination Does not compare qualitative input data and quantitative analysis with the organization’s em ployee demographic data 30 Artic ulation of Res pon se Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
I need a paper that reference my Milestone 1.
0 Milestone Two: Total Rewards Analysis Contina Clemons Southern New Hampshire University March 26, 2021 Milestone Two: Benefits and Compensation Analysis Total rewards analysis is important to determine misalignments, differences and gaps between what we at Emerging Pharmaceuticals are currently providing our employees and what out competitor is providing. We benchmark our total rewards program using the market and our competitors. Reviewing data of our competitors shows what we as an organization could increase, reduce or keep our benefits. Total Rewards Analysis: Misalignment, Differences, and Gaps APA 7th Edition Style™ uses Level Two headings after the introductory paragraphs. To transform a line of text into a Level Two heading, click Heading 2 in Microsoft Word’s Style area of the Home ribbon. When you have a Level Two heading in APA, use Word’s Heading 2 Style. Align Level Two headings, or place Level Two headings flush with, the left margin. In Level Two headings, capitalize all major words. Headings created with this template use bold, 12-point Times New Roman font. APA specifies formatting for up to five heading levels of in a paper, but most student papers only need one or two levels. Headings help readers identify where they are in the paper, in the same way that a road sign helps drivers determine their location. Wilson (2011) analyzed the section headings on 378 undergraduate papers, and determined section headings reliably outline a writer’s thoughts (pp. 37-38). Total Rewards Analysis: Increased, Reduced or Stay the Same If you introduce another major heading in your paper, this section may require another Level One heading. Submit APA documents using black print and white document background. APA Style™ does not use text colors such as blue, red, or green (Moore et al., 2011). Fancy colorful paper or colored paper is not acceptable for academic writing. If you paste a web address or URL into your paper, Word may convert it to an active hyperlink with blue underlining. Remove blue underlining by left-clicking the link and selecting “Remove hyperlink.” Total Rewards Analysis: Population Affected Use Word’s headings feature to create a table of contents automatically. A table of contents is normally not necessary in a typical short paper. However, a table of contents often is required for a thesis or capstone project. You can find the button for generating a table of contents automatically on the extreme left of Word’s “References” ribbon (Lytle, 2013). References American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https//:doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000 Butler, D. (2010). It takes time getting legitimate sources for research papers. In J. A. Bell & L. L. Luesing (Eds.), The art of good research (3rd ed., pp. 1256-1299). Harper & Row. Carpenter, C. A., & Anderson, A. B. (2012). The thrill of writing an amazing paper. Journal of Excellent Writing, 56(3), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1289.jew.34567 Dombek-Smith, B. L. (2011). How to write with flow and tone in APA. Fictitious Unreal University Press. Lytle, R. N. (2013). Writing academically: It is easier than you think. Journal of Writing for College, 6(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1070.jwc.123456d Moore, C., Ullom, S., Summers, J. C., Anderson, B. X., Colaw, M., Brown, S. J., & Tryon, R. (2011). Why using a writing style provides consistency and structure to a college level paper. Journal of Excellent Writing, 55(4), 100-116. https://doi.org/10.1289.jew.891011 Wilson, E. O. (2011). Writing to convey meaning and context. Harper & Row. https://www.ebscohost.com
I need a paper that reference my Milestone 1.