I need some assistance with these assignment. analysis of writing style Thank you in advance for the help! I did this by specifically demonstrating the benefits of increasing fuel prices in America. Actually, to relevantly address different audiences, change the purpose of the paper, change the message of the second essay, and remain in the right context, these adjustments were necessary. Such adjustments include a change in my introduction to my second essay, diction, and style of writing (Trinity College of the Bible Web). The adjustments, therefore, enabled me to address a different audience, convey a different message, alter the context, and change the purpose of the paper. The adjustments reflected my rhetorical choices in my writing process. As a result, my writing was effective in informing and convincing my audience to support the increase in fuel prices for purposes of controlling global warming because of increased fuel emissions. This paper details the reflection on my writing process and rhetorical analysis on my writing process from the controversial essay to the public argument essay on increasing the fuel prices in America.
Indeed, I was able to change the vision of my audience from a controversial point of view to a convincing position on the need to support the increase in fuel prices as a measure to control global warming. Initially, I took time and space to inform my audience on the different controversies that exist in relation to increasing fuel prices with arguments and counterarguments. I did this by narrowing down my information to the benefits of increasing the fuel prices hence convincing them to support my position by drawing their focus to the many benefits of my position. I equally used facts and background information to appeal to the academic audience in the introduction of the second essay. Nevertheless, to address a different audience that may not be that learned, it was necessary to change the introduction. After drawing the extent of the problem and the need for communal involvement, it was easy to change the vision of my audience by proposing my solution.
However, I changed the introduction of the third essay by stating unconditionally the existence and adversity of global warming in the modern world to appeal to the different audiences.