i need someone to make the changes in final doc according to professor comment

comment

main issue here is plagiarism specillay week 5

Hi Saad :

Total points earned (rounded): 97 out of 150 (65%).
Task Requirements points earned: 24.7 out of 38 (65%).
Demonstration and application of knowledge points earned: 53.95 out of 83 (65%).
Academic writing and format points earned: 18 out of 30 (60%).
Strengths: Content.
Opportunities for improvement: Check your work. Format. Address previous comments.Lower your OV score.
Additional Comments: Address previous comments. Do not indent the first word in the abstract. The abstract should summarize the contents of the entire document. Lower your OV score. Repaginate the table of contents. Click inside and press F9; select update field and page numbers only. Format all paragraphs (except abstract and pseudocode) with the first word indented ½ inch from the left. Check your work (compacity). You did not provide pseudocode for stacks and queues using linked lists. I did not understand the following: “… will likewise take a gander at the Big O evaluate”. Check your work (“These utilization the O(n^2) run time which is unacceptable”, “). What is an ‘air bubble sort’? Cite your work. This is not clear: “One of the primary elements prominences of certain issues is the preparing pace and forces, much the same as quick games vehicles, which are typically the most mainstream ones”. What is ‘brisk sort’? I also did not understand what you meant by ‘utilizing files as a correlation parameter’. Do not use the author’s first initial in the citations. IP4 should start on a new page. What is an ‘inquiry parallel exhibit’? This is not clear: “On the off chance that its in the cluster than its prime, if not unreasonably the hunt could blunder out”. The description of binary search in an array was not clearly stated. Having two pointers to find the middle of the linked list is inefficient and will not result in log times for the search, as discussed in the last live chat. Use binary search trees instead. The (Borrego, 2019) citation is not correct since it is last year’s and it refers to a live chat 5, which has not been released yet. .

instructions

Week 5 Deliverables:

The following sections should be completed, including the collaboration of each section IP. Feedback received from the instructor and peers should be incorporated into the final paper.

• Title Page
• Table of Contents
• Abstract
• Project Outline/Project Background
  • Section 1: Lists, Stacks, and Queues
  • Section 2: Hashing, Heaps and Trees
  • Section 3: Sorting Algorithms
  • Section 4: Searching
  • Section 5: Recursion
• Conclusion
• References
• New Content
  • Create a pseudo code routine that will ask the user for a number, and then using recursion, generate the factorial of that number.
  • Create fully documented pseudo code to prompt for a number and generate the factorial, including error and bound checking.
  • Create a test plan to show how the program runs and can be executed.
  • Name the document “IT265__Final.doc.”