I will pay for the following article Boethius View on Free Will. The work is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page. Entails a succinct understanding of the ability of humans to launch a detailed and comprehensive inquiry in a concern or problem. The voluntary decisions of the mind render the determination of problem causation an unlimited endeavor. The notion of necessity and causation of phenomena or a problem has virtually no end and any inquiry would turn to end at supposition (Cahn 869). The only way to determine problem causations is to bring diverse causes to narrow positions and assume that the unit used is representative enough to believe in the cause.
In response to the question of necessity and liberty of the mind, there is a dire need to find a means of proving a free will. It is by liberty that there the proof of free will shall be based. It entails the capacity to follow or diverse the actions we have according to the forces dictated by the will. That is, if one chooses to proceed with an issue, he or she enjoys the freedom. Similarly, if the same person chooses to reverse the decision, they would enjoy the same level of freedom to do so as they would perform the contrary (Cahn 869). That would offer a ten tentative means of determining free will.
Ethics and religion, in any society, show relationships and tend to be complementary. Religion plays a plausible role in making society to submit. The presence of religion in the society renders the society to embrace ethical submissions, compared to if there was no religion. The human mind and the divine mind are distinct and different based on ethical considerations. The society’s moral qualities are different from the qualities set by religions. Religion, therefore, is of the central role in shaping the ethical standards of society (Cahn 968). The demand for free will that humanity tends to presume to possess is impractical, to some extent that the demand may be void of specificity.