Was your classmate’s reasoning articulate and logical? Were the facts correct?, HR 3.3 discussion help

Hello! Please
Create discussion response for the attached write-up and be write as if
you were reviewing his or her posting in an academic
journal. Your discussion response should therefore answer the following
questions as applicable:

1. 1. Was your classmate’s reasoning articulate and logical? Were the facts correct?
   2. Was the interpretation your classmate provided reasonable
      and consistent with experts in the field? Did your classmate defend the
      choices effectively?

The focus for your critical analysis is not whether or not you
agree with your classmate, but how well his or her position was
presented.

2. Each response should be 250-300 words in length and is to
   include a minimum of two sources properly cited and referenced: (a) the Strategic Compensation
   textbook, and (b) an academic journal article (selected from the above
   listing) that is at least 3-5 pages in length and published within the
   last 3-5 years.

Please respond to LydiaF
response referencing this article https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/c…

Please respond to TWood response referencing this article https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/compensation/Pages/CustomerSatisfaction.aspx

Thanks!

Attached are the write-up’s, articles listed above in bold and list of acceptable HR journals.